Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Would you wipe out all of Europe to save the world?

So a crazed cambodgian scientist decides to destroy the world. The only way to stop him is to blow up all of Europe and its inhabitants. You got the Kahunas to do it? I would do it. The world must be saved.Would you wipe out all of Europe to save the world?
Why can't I just bomb where he is...Would you wipe out all of Europe to save the world?
[QUOTE=''Toriko42'']Why can't I just bomb where he is...[/QUOTE]Kill or be killed is the way of this topic. CHOOSE!!!
Wipe out one continent to save the other six? Sure.
Awesome, I am at the moment typing up a book report on utopia and dystopia in modern drama, andsome of the plays discussedtouch on stuff similar to this.As for an answer, I imagine such an act to save the world would also have to leave it in a pretty crazy state. The act of wiping out a continent is certainly not without consequences to the rest of the planet. Would we all be better off dead as opposed to living in theterrible aftermath? Questions to think about. Personally, if the destruction of Europe is the only way to avoid complete world destruction, it's something we'd have to try. Hopefully we can still off ourselves if the world is basically unlivable afterwards.
Why does a Cambodian guy want to destroy the world?
No, Radiohead live there. Without Radiohead life wouldn't be worth living.
i would destroy the entire world to save it from humanity, but not portions of it
Ummm obviously
[QUOTE=''Cactus_Matt'']No, Radiohead live there. Without Radiohead life wouldn't be worth living.[/QUOTE]



Lol their best stuff is behind them. Besides they'll probably break up in 4-5 years or be completely obscure. Plus there will be FAR better bands the RH in the future.
Why Europe? = /
Only if Europe includes the person on this thread with the boy band guy in his/her signature. I'm just kidding...kind of. Also, note the irony.
I would not consider wiping out Europe to save the world, but I might consider wiping out America to save the world. After all, one must focus on the least amount of collateral damage in the pursuit of a longer lasting peace.
[QUOTE=''Schnauzerz''][QUOTE=''Cactus_Matt'']No, Radiohead live there. Without Radiohead life wouldn't be worth living.[/QUOTE] Lol their best stuff is behind them. Besides they'll probably break up in 4-5 years or be completely obscure. Plus there will be FAR better bands the RH in the future.[/QUOTE]Says you.
[QUOTE=''YourChaosIsntMe'']Only if Europe includes the person on this thread with the boy band guy in his/her signature.[/QUOTE]Sorry, Texas. :P Lost a bet. Personally, the presence of Steve Smith in my sig is much harder to handle than Timberlake. My 2-and-a-half month sentence will actually be over this coming weekend.
after everyone in europe was relocated to other continents, yes i would blow it up, because it would save the world and no one would live there anymore.
No, I'd rather wipe out North Korea or most of the USA instead.
[QUOTE=''Cactus_Matt''][QUOTE=''Schnauzerz''][QUOTE=''Cactus_Matt'']No, Radiohead live there. Without Radiohead life wouldn't be worth living.[/QUOTE] Lol their best stuff is behind them. Besides they'll probably break up in 4-5 years or be completely obscure. Plus there will be FAR better bands the RH in the future.[/QUOTE]Says you.[/QUOTE]



Omg, an opinion.
[QUOTE=''Hungry_Jello''][QUOTE=''Toriko42'']Why can't I just bomb where he is...[/QUOTE]

Kill or be killed is the way of this topic. CHOOSE!!![/QUOTE]Exactly, Id bomb him so Im not killed.



/thread
And leave America?No thanks.

No comments:

Post a Comment